Talk:SMS Siegfried/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 16:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC) I will review this article, along with the five others. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Introduction
[edit]Excellent introductory section. Consummately expository.
Infobox
[edit]Perfectly fine.
Design
[edit]This section seems to be fine.
Service history
[edit]One slight issue present. I feel Kiel-Nordmole should receive a redline.
Conclusion
[edit]A very fine article indeed. Once the Kiel-Nordmole issue is resolved, I will pass this article. Congratulations!
Also, in case you were wondering, I will be reviewing each of the articles I have committed to review independent of each other. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 20:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, that seems like a reasonable suggestion. I've seen references to Kiel-Nordmole, but nothing really to start anything beyond a 1-sentence stub, but it's worth having a redlink. Parsecboy (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)